Monday, December 18, 2017

Dear Samsung, please don't cripple the smaller Galaxy S9


Dear Samsung, please don't cripple the smaller Galaxy S9


The Android rumor mill is rapidly churning out leaks about Samsung’s Galaxy S9, and at first glance there’s a lot to like: a fingerprint sensor in a reasonable central location, even smaller bezels, dual cameras, and 6 GB of RAM. Yesterday, GSMArena even shared images of what appear to be the S9’s front and rear panels.
There’s just one problem: according to current rumors, not all of these upgrade are coming to the smaller Galaxy S9. Specifically, only the larger model will get the extra 2 GB of RAM and dual cameras.*Loud sigh*
Up to 2017, Samsung has been one of very few manufacturers that still makes a ‘small’ phone without any spec compromises. The only meaningful difference between the S8 and S8+ was battery size, which was mostly offset by the latter’s larger display. It’s been roughly the same story ever since Samsung introduced a larger flagship with the S6 Edge.



Credit: GSMArena


Meanwhile, most other manufacturers either cripple their smaller devices or abandoned abandoned making a small phone in the first place. The iPhone 8 is missing the dual cameras of its larger sibling and has less RAM. While the RAM can be forgiven since the Plus is driving more pixels, the lack of a dual camera is no small difference – optical zoom and portrait mode are some of the iPhone’s biggest selling points.
On the Android side, Google is the closest to Samsung’s feature parity between models, but the smaller Pixel 2 is missing the attractive bezel-less design of its larger sibling, and its lower resolution makes for a significantly inferior VR experience. Samsung is pretty much the only manufacturer that has kept both sizes as close to feature and performance parity as possible.  Same processor, same RAM, same camera setup, and even the same resolution.
I think I speak for many a short-fingered folk when I say I’d hate to see the smaller S9 be neglected. Even if Samsung sold the smaller model at a way-reduced price, and even if you don’t care about dual cameras or extra RAM, it sets a worrisome precedent for future models. The phones are currently expected to be announced at Mobile World Congress in February; here’s hoping the spec rumors don’t pan out.


Alleged photo of Galaxy S9 backplate suggests a single camera setup
on GSMARena



Read next:

Facebook makes it easier to hide your mug from its facial recognition tech




Src: https://thenextweb.com/mobile/2017/12/19/dear-samsung-please-dont-cripple-smaller-galaxy-s9/

Samsung Galaxy S9+ specs sighted on Geekbench - Android Community


Samsung Galaxy S9+ specs sighted on Geekbench


We may be focusing more on the Galaxy S9 but this week, more information about the bigger variant, the Galaxy S9+, were sighted on Geekbench. Much has been said about the standard Galaxy S9 but allow us to focus on the S9+ this time. The Plus variant is said to be powered by Android 8.0 Oreo out of the box, 6GB RAM, and Snapdragon 845 processor. The model number listed on the benchmark site is Samsung SM-G965U1. Single-core and Multi-Core scores are listed and it appears information are recently uploaded.
We have another preview of the Galaxy S9+ as protective phone cases and covers appeared on Mobile Fun this week. The S9 is believed to have a single rear camera while the S9+ will have the dual real camera setup. The Galaxy S9 duo may possibly launch in February with a mid-March release. We know the two will arrive earlier than usual  but they might be teased at the CES 2018 this January.
Several rendered images and a 360-degree video were shown off already while the schematic images confirmed the rear fingerprint sensor. We’re also looking forward to that improved iris recognition, large display, and bezel-less design.
Let’s wait and see how this one will be different or similar to the Galaxy S8 and S8+ phones.
SOURCE: Geekbench



Src: https://androidcommunity.com/samsung-galaxy-s9-specs-sighted-on-geekbench-20171220/

Android Oreo Beta for the Samsung Galaxy S8 Adds App Permission Monitor


Android Oreo Beta for the Samsung Galaxy S8 Adds App Permission Monitor


Older versions of Android used to grant carte blanche permissions to every new app installed on a user’s device. This wasn’t great for privacy, as some apps had a habit of requesting permissions that they didn’t need. Google added a permissions management framework called App Ops in Android Jelly Bean to address the issue, and custom ROMs like CyanogenMod engineered their own solution in Privacy Guard. But it took until Android Marshmallow for Google to completely revamp Android’s permissions system.
Android Marshmallow added granular permissions management that allowed users to see which permissions an app was using, and to accept or deny it those permissions. Apps targeting the Marshmallow API also weren’t granted access to all permissions by default — instead, they had to request specific permissions as needed.
The new functionality brought stock Android pretty close to parity with custom ROMs, but there’s room for improvement. In Android Marshmallow and newer, users aren’t notified about which permissions are being used by apps in the background. It’s an area where Samsung’s moved one step ahead of Google.
In the Android Oreo beta for the Galaxy S8, there’s a Permissions Manager app in Lock Screen > Security > App Permission Monitor that lets you see which apps have used permissions in the background, which is helpful in identifying apps that don’t have a reason for using permissions such as location and contacts. The App Permission Monitor even notifies you about suspicious apps so that you can see exactly what they’re doing.
It should be noted that the Galaxy Note 8’s stock ROM (based on Android Nougat) has Samsung’s Permission Manager feature. However, it wasn’t included in the Nougat-based stock ROM for the Galaxy S8 and S8+.
There’s no doubt about it: The App Permission Monitor is useful feature, especially if you’re concerned about apps violating your privacy.

Source: /u/Dalbinder




Src: https://www.xda-developers.com/android-oreo-beta-galaxy-s8-app-permission-monitor/

Samsung Galaxy Note 8 named Flagship Smartphone of the year in India


Samsung Galaxy Note 8 named Flagship Smartphone of the year in India








The Galaxy Note 8 won the award at the Exhibit Tech Awards 2017.
The phone was named Gadget of the Year at India Mobile Congress in September.
Samsung also took home Wearable Gadget of the Year for the Gear S3 smartwatch.



Samsung’s Galaxy Note 8 earned the title of Flagship Smartphone of the Year at the Exhibit Tech Awards in Gurgaon, India, last night.
The award caps off a spectacular comeback year for Samsung. Just over a year ago, the Samsung Galaxy Note 7 was recalled due to faulty battery design causing devices to overheat and catch on fire. There was speculation at the time that Samsung would end the Note lineup because it was seen as tarnished beyond any possibility of a comeback.
Well, it’s back in a big way. The Flagship Smartphone of the Year award follows another win in September, when India Mobile Congress named the Galaxy Note 8 Gadget of the Year. It’s easy to see why the phone is so well loved by reviewers and customers alike. It has a big, beautiful display, takes great pictures, and has fantastic battery life. While it didn’t top our Best of Android 2017 list, it did come a close second behind the Huawei Mate 10 Pro.

Samsung won two big awards at the Exhibit Tech Awards 2017, with #GalaxyNote8 winning the ‘Flagship Smartphone of the Year’ and the #GearS3 winning the ‘Wearable Gadgets of the Year’. Here are a few pictures from the event. Have a look and share! pic.twitter.com/3swoNIJr1U
— Samsung Mobile India (@SamsungMobileIN) December 20, 2017

Samsung had plenty to celebrate at last night’s awards, beyond the Galaxy Note 8 win: the Gear S3 smartwatch won Wearable Gadget of the Year. The watch, which came out earlier this year, recently got a major facelift with Samsung’s Value Pack update. The Gear S3’s new features include real-time heart rate monitoring and the ability to sync, edit, and add new contacts. Widgets, apps, and icons now fit better and load faster, and a Moments Bar allows users to change settings quickly.
Is the Samsung Galaxy Note 8 your phone of the year? If not, what is? Let us know in the comments.



Src: https://www.androidauthority.com/samsung-galaxy-note-8-flagship-award-india-824747/

Android Pay vs Apple & Samsung Pay - Android Authority


Android Pay vs Apple & Samsung Pay


When you go shopping this holiday season, many of you might be tempted to ditch using your credit cards, or even cash, in favor of one of the mobile payment systems that’s available for smartphones. Starting with Apple Pay, which launched in 2014, and joined later by rivals like Android Pay and Samsung Pay, it’s become more and more popular to pay with your smartphone, whether you are at a physical retail store or online at your favorite shopping web site.



But which online payment system is right for you, and what are the advantages and disadvantages of each system? In this article, we take a detailed look at Apple Pay, Android Pay and Samsung Pay, including their pros and cons, in order to give you a better idea of which of these mobile payment services may work best for you.
What is Apple Pay?



Apple Pay was first announced by company CEO Tim Cook as part of its iPhone 6 press event in September 2014.  The service itself didn’t launch until October, with the iOS 8.1 update, and only worked at first on the iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus. Later, the service expanded, in terms of native hardware support, to the first generation Apple Watch, and has since been included out of the box for all of the new iPhones, Apple Watches and recent editions of the company’s MacBook Pro laptop that use Touch ID. Apple Pay is also available on the company’s iPads, but only via an app, with no native hardware support. Owners of the company’s Mac PC products can also access it, via the Safari web browser.
In very basic terms, Apple Pay allows owners of the most recent iPhone or Apple Watch devices to add their own credit or debit cards, via the Wallet iOS app, for use in Apple Pay. Apple Pay also supports storage of gift cards and retailer rewards cards. Using those devices’ native NFC (Near-field Communication) hardware, you can take your iPhone or Apple Watch to any retail store that supports the service, and tap on its point-of-sale terminal to pay for any item at the store. You can also use Apple Pay in any app that also supports the service. Apple says that it uses “Device Account Numbers” for each credit or debit card that’s stored for Apple Pay use, and each transaction made with the service is also supposed to have its own security code. In theory, this means hackers should not be able to detect your credit or debit card numbers or bank accounts each time you use Apple Pay.
Pros
Because it got started first, in 2013, Apple got a head start on its two biggest rivals in terms of adding banks, retailers and country support for Apple Pay. Currently, the service is supported in over 20 countries and territories. making it the most widely supported mobile payment service. In a recent presentation during the Money20/20 business event in Las Vegas event, current Apple Pay head Jennifer Bailey said that just the United States, where it first launched in October 2014, Apple Pay support has expanded to over 50 percent of all retailers. All of the major banks in the US support Apple Pay for their credit and debit cards, and the number of smaller banks and credit unions that support the service also continues to grow.
In addition to the previously mentioned security features for Apple Pay, owners of iOS devices with Touch ID can add a further layer of privacy by only allowing Apple Pay to work when users put their fingerprint on the Touch ID sensor. In the recently launched iPhone X, that kind of security is replaced with that phone’s Face ID system, which uses the owners own face to confirm payments for Apple Pay.
Apple is also not done with adding features to Apple Pay. In the upcoming iOS 11.2 update, which is currently available as a beta release as of this writing, the company will launch Apple’s Pay Cash. Similar to other services like  Venmo, Apple Pay Cash will allow users to send money to others, via the iMessage app. Those payments will be sent from your stored credit or debit card. The update will also let users receive money from others, which will go in the “Apple Pay Cash” card, a virtual card that’s accessible via iOS’s Wallet app.
Cons
The biggest issue with using Apple Pay is one that’s a familiar reason for most of Apple’s services. Apple Pay can only be use on the company own devices and apps. If you use an Android phone, you are out of luck. In addition, if you still use an older iPhone 5, iPhone 5s or iPhone 5c, Apple Pay will only work in retail stores if you also use an Apple Watch to connect to the phone and complete the payment.
In addition, if you use a smaller bank or credit union in the US, you may also not be able to add your credit or debit card yet to the Apple Pay service, although the company regularly added new banks on a pretty frequent basis. While 50 percent of all US retailers may support Apple Pay, that also means the other half does not.
What is Android Pay?



Google first revealed Android Pay its 2015 I/O developer conference, and it officially launched in September, 2015 in the US. Like Apple Pay, Android Pay is a mobile payment system, designed to let people purchase items and services both online and in the real world. It also uses NFC hardware on Android phones, and also stores credit and debit card information. A single from the  NFC hardware from a compatible Android phone or Android Wear-based smartwatches to a retailer’s POS terminal completes the purchase. Android Pay can also be used online, with supported apps, and some retailers also support purchasing items online via Android Pay from Google’s Chrome web browser.
While it launched first in the US, it has since expanded its reach and is now available from banks and other financial institutions in a total of 17 countries It is scheduled to launch later in 2017 in South Korea and Slovakia. Earlier this year, the company launched a separate payment service, Google Tez, in the huge market of India. It works with the Indian government’s Unified Payments Interface (UPI) for mobile transactions.
As with Apple Pay Android Pay uses near field communication (NFC) technology on supported Android smartphones and Android Wear watches. If their bank or credit union supports it, a user can add their credit or debit card information on their Android Pay account. When they want to pay for an item at a physical retail store, they take their phone or watch and place it near the retailer’s point-of-sale terminal. A signal send through NFC hardware send the payment information from the phone or watch to the POS terminal. Android Pay can also be used on some NFC-enabled ATMs so users can get cash money from their bank account, again without having to pull out their credit or debit card.



Again, as with Apple Pay, many Android apps support purchasing products with Android Pay as well. You can also store and use a number of gift cards and retailer rewards cards on your Android Pay account. For an additional amount of security, you can set up Android Pay so that, if your phone has a fingerprint scanner, it can be used to verify the payment within the app.
Pros
While Apple Pay is restricted to a limited number of devices, all made by Apple, Android Pay works on the vast majority of Android smartphones and Android Wear smartwatches, including ones from Google itself as well as third-party devices. Indeed, it works on any NFC-based phone that’s running Android as old as 4.4 KitKat.  That means many more phones are supported for Android Pay in comparison to Apple Pay. In addition, Android Pay users can also type in a passcode to enable a payment if their phone does not have a fingerprint reader.
About 1.5 million retail locations in the US currently support Android Pay, with more being added all the time. Over 1,000 banks and credit units in the US, including all of the major ones, support Android Pay, and again, more of them are being added all the time.
Cons
As we have said, Android Pay expansion continues in more countries and banks. However, the sheer number of markets and banks that support Android Pay doesn’t not yet current match those of Apple Pay. Therefor, if you own both an Android Pay-based phone, and an iPhone that supports Apple Pay, the chances are better that your bank will have support for Apple Pay. If you live in Canada, that issue is a bigger consider as two of that country’s large banks, RBC and TD Bank, support Apple Pay but not Android Pay.
What is Samsung Pay?



Launched in 2015, around the same time as Android Pay, Samsung Pay is currently available to be used on a number of the company’s recent high end and mid-range Galaxy-based smartphones along with its Gear S2 and Gear S3 smartwatches. The biggest difference between Samsung Pay and its two rival services is that, in addition to supporting NFC-based terminals, users can also take their supported phone or watch and make payments on POS systems that use the older Magnetic Secure Transmission (MST) technology. This is the same tech that’s used on credit and debit cards, with their magnetic stripe on the back.
Samsung has put in a magnetic coil inside some of its recent Galaxy smartphones, and the field created by that coil, combined with the Samsung Pay app, can be used to transmit payment signals to normal credit and debit card terminals with the MST tech. In essence, Samsung Pay make those terminals think they are being accessed by a normal magnetic strip found in credit and debit cards. As with the other two systems, Samsung Pay transmits a unique number, rather than giving out your credit or debit card information, when it makes payments, keeping it secure.
Pros
The biggest advantage in using Samsung Pay is that users don’t have to rely on retailers having NFC-based POS terminals. They can use Samsung Pay at pretty much any store that has an old fashioned MTS-based credit or debit card reader. Thus, Samsung Pay users should, in theory, have many more options for using it in physical stores, especially during the holiday season.
Cons
As with Android Pay, Samsung Pay is currently supported by all of the major banks in the US, but the sheer number of banks and credit units it supports does not match that of Apple Pay, at least not yet. As with Android Pay, more countries and banks are added with Samsung Pay support on a regular basis. The biggest issue with Samsung Pay is that it only works with a certain number of Samsung-made Android smartphones, (all of which also support Android Pay) and just two of its smartwatches. Finally, Samsung Pay requried the use of a fingerprint scanner to complete translations, unlike Android Pay which can also use a passcode.
Conclusion
As you can see, the three major mobile payment systems all have their distinct features, along with their own advantages and disadvantages. Do you go with Apple Pay, with its greater reach of banks and markets, but limits on the number of devices? Do you pick Android Pay, with the widest number of devices supporting it but not as much support from banks. Do you pick Samsung Pay, which can be used by nearly any credit or debit card reader, but also suffers from a limited number of devices? Let us know which one you would want to use in the comments!



Src: https://www.androidauthority.com/android-pay-vs-apple-pay-vs-samsung-pay-2-688041/

Samsung Galaxy S9's HTML5 Test Confirms 18.5:9 Aspect Ratio | Androidheadlines.com


Samsung Galaxy S9's HTML5 Test Confirms 18.5:9 Aspect Ratio


Two Samsung Electronics-made smartphones bearing the model numbers SM-G960F and SM-G9650 that are believed to be the Galaxy S9 and Galaxy S9 Plus, respectively, appeared in the database of the HTML5 benchmark earlier today. As is usually the case with HTML5 tests, the newly uncovered listings don’t reveal the true resolutions of the devices but do hint at their actual figures and aspect ratios. The 360 × 740 resolution of the supposed Galaxy S9 and the 412 x 846 display of the alleged Galaxy S9 Plus are hence indicative of an 18.5:9 image format, the very same one Samsung already commercialized with the Galaxy S8, Galaxy S8 Plus, Galaxy Note 8, and the recently announced Galaxy A8 (2018) lineup of Android mid-rangers.
The benchmark listings are also in line with previous reports claiming both smartphones will succeed the QHD+ resolution supported by their predecessors, i.e. feature 2,960 x 1,440 Infinity Display panels. The Galaxy S9 series is widely expected to provide consumers with iterative upgrades on the Galaxy S8 lineup instead of experimenting with radical redesigns. The South Korean tech giant is said to have opted for an aesthetic that’s essentially a blend of its last two flagships, featuring corners that are more rounded than those found on the Galaxy Note 8 but with an overall blockier design compared to the Galaxy S8. The smaller Galaxy S9 is expected to ship with the same 5.8-inch Super AMOLED display and a 3,200mAh battery as opposed to a 3,000mAh one found inside its predecessor while also being set to replace Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 835 with the Snapdragon 845 chipset in the United States and China. International versions of both devices are likely to be powered by Samsung’s Exynos 9810 SoC.
The two handsets should run Android 8.0 Oreo out of the box, with their suspected HTML5 tests confirming that particular feature. Other annual improvements are said to be reserved for the Galaxy S9 Plus, a 6.2-inch phablet that’s supposedly the only member of the upcoming product family to boast a dual-camera setup and 6GB of RAM instead of 4GB. The most premium variant of the device may also ship with Samsung’s new 512GB flash memory chip, though both the Galaxy S9 and Galaxy S9 Plus are expected to have a storage base of 64GB. The devices are rumored to launch on February 27th and start retailing in late March.



Src: https://www.androidheadlines.com/2017/12/samsung-galaxy-s9s-html5-test-confirms-18-59-aspect-ratio.html

Samsung Galaxy S9 spotted on Geekbench with impressive score - GoAndroid


Samsung Galaxy S9 spotted on Geekbench with impressive score


Samsung is only months away unveiling their next flagship, the Galaxy S9 duo. We already know how it will look from all angles, kudos to the renders  by popular leaker Steve Hemmerstoffer widely known as @OnLeaks. And now, Galaxy S9 with model number SM-G965U1 gets spotted on Geekbench confirming most of the specs with an impressive score.



According to the Geekbench listing, the upcoming Samsung Galaxy S9 will have the model number SM-G965U1. It will be powered by Qualcomm’s latest Snapdragon 845 processor which was unveiled few days ago. However, in some regions like India, the Galaxy S9 duo will be powered by Samsung’s own Exynos 9810 SoC. Further, the processor will be coupled with 6GB of RAM. And the phone will run on Android 8.0 Oreo out of the box.
Actually, these were the expected specs and now they are confirmed. But, what is more interesting is the benchmark score of Snapdragon 845. The phone scores 2422 for Single Core and 8351 for Multi Core performances. Thus, the Galaxy S9 becomes Samsung’s first smartphone to score such high score. Even it could be the first Android smartphone with higher Geekbench score if it gets released before any other OEM’s flagship.
On the design front, the Galaxy S9 duo will be similar to the Galaxy S8 duo except for the new fingerprint placement and dual cameras on the plus version. There is no exact date available regarding the announcement of these new devices. But, it is sure that it will be announced in the first quarter next year.




Follow Us on our Channels:









Src: https://www.goandroid.co.in/samsung-galaxy-s9-geekbench-score/76172/

Android Oreo on Samsung device to name screenshots based on app - Android Community


Android Oreo on Samsung device to name screenshots based on app


When you do a lot of screenshots on your mobile device for one reason or another, trying to find it eventually can sometimes be a bit difficult. Well, they’re all in one folder so there’s that, but still, it may be hard to scroll through all of those screencaps just to get what you’re looking for. If you use a Samsung device, one of the things to look forward to when the Android 8.0 Oreo finally arrives is that it will name your screenshot according to where you took it from.
It’s not anything major of course, but it’s an important feature to have if you do take a lot of screenshots, either for work or for your personal purposes. What it does is that whenever you take a screenshot, the file name will include what app you took it from, aside from the time and date which has always been included. So if you took the screenshot from Facebook, the file name will give you Screenshot_Facebook and then the numbers for the date/time.
It doesn’t seem to be part of the Android 8.0 Oreo update per se but rather this is something from Samsung itself. So if you’re using a non-Samsung device that will eventually run on Oreo, you won’t see this minor screenshot naming feature, unless your OEM sees this and eventually applies it to their devices as well.



Now as to when Samsung owners will get a stable build of Oreo, that is still up in the air. Until then, you’d have to manually rename your screenshots or just let them be and scroll through all of them until you find what you’re looking for.
VIA: SAM Mobile



Src: https://androidcommunity.com/android-oreo-on-samsung-device-to-name-screenshots-based-on-app-20171220/

Why do Android fanboys hate admitting that Samsung copied Apple?


Why do Android fanboys hate admitting that Samsung copied Apple?


It’s impossible to cover the mobile market without diving into the good ol’ “iOS vs. Android” debate from time to time. These are the two biggest mobile platforms on the planet, so they’re constantly being compared. Likewise, Samsung and Apple are the world’s top two smartphone vendors, so their phones are constantly pitted against each other as well.
Of course, there’s another reason Apple and Samsung are often mentioned in the same breath: after entering the market, Samsung quickly grew to become the top mobile device maker on the planet thanks in large part to Apple. First, Samsung did everything it possibly could to copy Apple’s iPhone and iPad. Then, it spent billions upon billions of dollars belittling Apple products in TV, online, and print advertising. Samsung spent years positioning its own devices as the cool alternative to Apple’s iPhone, and its efforts paid off big time.
Even now, Samsung continues to copy Apple all the time across several different product lines. The latest example is Samsung finally deciding to dive into the years-old smart speaker market now that Apple is getting ready to release the HomePod. Apple copies Samsung and other Android phone makers all the time too, obviously. What’s odd and ridiculous, though, is every time we discuss Samsung’s long history of copying Apple, Android fanboys seem to lose their minds.


Don't Miss:
$40 device adds gigabit Ethernet to your house without having to install anything or run cables


It will always be fascinating to me how passionate grown men and women can be about a smartphone. Say something negative about their platform of choice and they start foaming at the mouth. Heated debates ensue constantly, as though the topic at hand was religion or politics. It’s bizarre and, quite frankly, embarrassing. Smartphone vendors and mobile platforms are hardly the first areas of consumer tech to draw such passion though, and they won’t be the last.
That brings us to last Tuesday, when I published an article titled “After years of copying the iPhone, Samsung’s Galaxy S9 will finally copy Apple’s smartest strategy.” The article was about Samsung’s rumored decision to follow Apple’s lead next year and give the larger and more expensive Galaxy S9+ some exclusive features instead of making them identical apart from size, as it did with the Galaxy S8 and S8+.
Apple has done this with its iPhone Plus models for the past two years, and it encourages consumers to buy higher-margin phones. That’s obviously a good thing for Apple and its bottom line, so it makes sense that Samsung would follow Apple’s lead. In fact, it looks like the Galaxy S9+ will be differentiated from the Galaxy S9 in exactly the same ways the iPhone 7 Plus and 8 Plus are different from their smaller counterparts: A dual-lens camera and extra RAM.
In this article, I briefly discussed Samsung’s history of copying Apple. This is not a matter of opinion. This is a fact. Samsung spent a tremendous amount of time and energy copying Apple’s products. If you don’t trust your own eyes, you can trust the countless internal documents that were made public during the companies’ court battles. Apple was even awarded hundreds of millions of dollars in damages as a result of those lawsuits.
Apple copies Samsung all the time, too. For example, iPhones would still have teeny-weeny little 3.5-inch displays if not for Samsung. But the subject of this particular post was Samsung copying Apple, so that’s what I discussed. I even supplied hard evidence of Samsung’s history of copying Apple — a 132-page internal document Samsung created to help its Galaxy phone engineers copy the iPhone pixel by pixel — in the second sentence of the article. The second sentence. Yet I still received dozens of emails from angry Android fans trying to revise history and explain to me that Samsung has never copied Apple.

Uhh. OK?

Again, this is not a big deal. Samsung copies Apple. Apple copies Samsung. Toyota and Honda copy each other. Coke and Pepsi copy each other. Who cares? How could this possibly matter to someone enough to warrant hammering out an angry, misguided email to a complete stranger? It’s just so weird.
With that, I’ll offer some unsolicited advice to anyone who feels obligated to send unsolicited emails to people you don’t know about a damn smartphone: Pick the best product for your needs, and enjoy using it.

BGR Top Deals:



Today’s best deals: Nest Cam, $25 Alexa speaker, Bose, Sonos, 128GB microSD, Fitbit Ionic, more


$40 device adds gigabit Ethernet to your house without having to install anything or run cables



Trending Right Now:



New Galaxy S9 leak shows a design that’s so much better than the Galaxy S8


Leak shows Galaxy S9 will be Samsung’s most powerful phone ever, but it’s still no iPhone X


Samsung just launched a budget phone that brings good news for the Galaxy S9



See the original version of this article on BGR.com




Src: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/why-android-fanboys-hate-admitting-samsung-copied-apple-162738419.html